Research
Where a model is wrong matters as much as how often.
My work sits between optimization and applied modeling, on problems where a decision
follows from a computation: what a property is assessed at, what a facility draws from
the systems around it, what a solver certifies as optimal. In each of these the
interesting question is not only accuracy but structure — which errors are acceptable,
which are systematic, and what the method can honestly claim.
Three themes organize the work. They share a discipline: make the decision-relevant
structure explicit, distinguish what is observed from what is modeled, encode the
important trade-offs when the decision itself is optimized, and evaluate under the
conditions the application will actually face.